<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance" xmlns:xsd="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema" xmlns:pingback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/pingback/" xmlns:trackback="http://madskills.com/public/xml/rss/module/trackback/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>Dustin</title>
    <link>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/</link>
    <description>Thoughts on development</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <copyright>Dustin Updyke</copyright>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 02:52:22 GMT</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>newtelligence dasBlog 1.9.6264.0</generator>
    <managingEditor>dustin@updyke.com</managingEditor>
    <webMaster>dustin@updyke.com</webMaster>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=d35852a0-5577-4911-bec7-42ea634c4ea7</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/PermaLink,guid,d35852a0-5577-4911-bec7-42ea634c4ea7.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/CommentView,guid,d35852a0-5577-4911-bec7-42ea634c4ea7.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=d35852a0-5577-4911-bec7-42ea634c4ea7</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p class="MsoNormal">
Comments on blogs irk me, but not for the reason you probably are thinking right now.
There are two kinds of blogs, those with comments and those without. There are places
for both, but blogs that posture an opinion should probably have comments and those
comments <b style=""><i style="">should not be deleted because you disagree with that
person’s stance</i></b>.
</p>
        <p class="MsoNormal">
For example, it seems that one of the favorite pastimes of A-list bloggers is to constantly
complain about Twitter’s <a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=twitter+outages">well
documented outages</a>. I don’t understand this behavior. If it doesn’t work, wouldn’t
you find something that does? 
</p>
        <p class="MsoNormal">
This comment got my attention:
</p>
        <p class="MsoNormal">
“Anyway, I'd like to really understand what's going on behind the scenes at Twitter,
Inc. They say they're confident the new infrastructure will hold up better, I'd like
to understand why. Can we have a meeting, with a few people from the tech community
who actively use Twitter and a few people from the company, to be briefed on what's
going on. The same way the President briefs Congress when there's some kind of international
crisis.”
</p>
        <p class="MsoNormal">
So I simply commented, “Why would you think Twitter owes you an explanation?” 
</p>
        <p class="MsoNormal">
To which I got the reply “…watch your accusatory tone.” 
</p>
        <p class="MsoNormal">
Hmm, I’ve already put them on the defensive, so I soften my reply a bit: “How is that
accusatory? I just don’t think that a company is going to accept that they owe you
something…” (or something very close to this).
</p>
        <p class="MsoNormal">
Moments later, I was <b>deleted</b> – the entire thread I started with a simple question,
was <b>gone</b>.
</p>
        <p class="MsoNormal">
Further research seems to indicate that this particular person is notorious for this
behavior. I don’t understand how a blog with comments is supposed to work when the
only view is the unilateral one. I have a huge amount of respect for <a href="http://www.codinghorror.com/">Jeff
Atwood</a> because of the simple reason that he makes bold statements based on research
and then lets the comments come to life. More than half do not follow his reasoning,
but that’s where the magic is – based on all this back and forth, I’m getting the
story and then I’m hearing opposing arguments all in one thread.
</p>
        <p class="MsoNormal">
My only recourse was to unsubscribe from those who would not open comments up to opposing
views. I simply can’t trust what they have to say any longer. I voice unchecked is
not something I am willing to listen to – if you are doing this, <i>you are just shouting
at me</i> and to that I say, “no thanks”.
</p>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=d35852a0-5577-4911-bec7-42ea634c4ea7" />
      </body>
      <title>Comments and shouting</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/PermaLink,guid,d35852a0-5577-4911-bec7-42ea634c4ea7.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/PermaLink,guid,d35852a0-5577-4911-bec7-42ea634c4ea7.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 15 Mar 2008 02:52:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;
Comments on blogs irk me, but not for the reason you probably are thinking right now.
There are two kinds of blogs, those with comments and those without. There are places
for both, but blogs that posture an opinion should probably have comments and those
comments &lt;b style=""&gt;&lt;i style=""&gt;should not be deleted because you disagree with that
person’s stance&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/b&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;
For example, it seems that one of the favorite pastimes of A-list bloggers is to constantly
complain about Twitter’s &lt;a href="http://www.google.com/search?q=twitter+outages"&gt;well
documented outages&lt;/a&gt;. I don’t understand this behavior. If it doesn’t work, wouldn’t
you find something that does? 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;
This comment got my attention:
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;
“Anyway, I'd like to really understand what's going on behind the scenes at Twitter,
Inc. They say they're confident the new infrastructure will hold up better, I'd like
to understand why. Can we have a meeting, with a few people from the tech community
who actively use Twitter and a few people from the company, to be briefed on what's
going on. The same way the President briefs Congress when there's some kind of international
crisis.”
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;
So I simply commented, “Why would you think Twitter owes you an explanation?” 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;
To which I got the reply “…watch your accusatory tone.” 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;
Hmm, I’ve already put them on the defensive, so I soften my reply a bit: “How is that
accusatory? I just don’t think that a company is going to accept that they owe you
something…” (or something very close to this).
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;
Moments later, I was &lt;b&gt;deleted&lt;/b&gt; – the entire thread I started with a simple question,
was &lt;b&gt;gone&lt;/b&gt;.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;
Further research seems to indicate that this particular person is notorious for this
behavior. I don’t understand how a blog with comments is supposed to work when the
only view is the unilateral one. I have a huge amount of respect for &lt;a href="http://www.codinghorror.com/"&gt;Jeff
Atwood&lt;/a&gt; because of the simple reason that he makes bold statements based on research
and then lets the comments come to life. More than half do not follow his reasoning,
but that’s where the magic is – based on all this back and forth, I’m getting the
story and then I’m hearing opposing arguments all in one thread.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p class="MsoNormal"&gt;
My only recourse was to unsubscribe from those who would not open comments up to opposing
views. I simply can’t trust what they have to say any longer. I voice unchecked is
not something I am willing to listen to – if you are doing this, &lt;i&gt;you are just shouting
at me&lt;/i&gt; and to that I say, “no thanks”.
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=d35852a0-5577-4911-bec7-42ea634c4ea7" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/CommentView,guid,d35852a0-5577-4911-bec7-42ea634c4ea7.aspx</comments>
      <category>Blogging</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=2e23891d-cbba-4ba8-9407-441fb5641ca9</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/PermaLink,guid,2e23891d-cbba-4ba8-9407-441fb5641ca9.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/CommentView,guid,2e23891d-cbba-4ba8-9407-441fb5641ca9.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=2e23891d-cbba-4ba8-9407-441fb5641ca9</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">~ is the NOT operator in SQL, so for a
bit column, to flip a value the statement would be something like this:<br /><br />
UPDATE dbo.Users SET Optin = ~Optin WHERE Id = @id<br /><br />
Just found this today and after using SQL for so many years, this will definitely
come in handy going forward.<br /><p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=2e23891d-cbba-4ba8-9407-441fb5641ca9" /></body>
      <title>Flip bit column in SQL</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/PermaLink,guid,2e23891d-cbba-4ba8-9407-441fb5641ca9.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/PermaLink,guid,2e23891d-cbba-4ba8-9407-441fb5641ca9.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 17:23:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>~ is the NOT operator in SQL, so for a bit column, to flip a value the statement would be something like this:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
UPDATE dbo.Users SET Optin = ~Optin WHERE Id = @id&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Just found this today and after using SQL for so many years, this will definitely
come in handy going forward.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=2e23891d-cbba-4ba8-9407-441fb5641ca9" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/CommentView,guid,2e23891d-cbba-4ba8-9407-441fb5641ca9.aspx</comments>
      <category>Code</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=7de58f52-6ab2-4cb1-8824-1b66131ed060</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/PermaLink,guid,7de58f52-6ab2-4cb1-8824-1b66131ed060.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/CommentView,guid,7de58f52-6ab2-4cb1-8824-1b66131ed060.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=7de58f52-6ab2-4cb1-8824-1b66131ed060</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">This is the simple way of doing "are you
sure?" functionality in .NET: <pre name="dcode" class="html">&lt;asp:button runat="server" id="btnSubmit" text="Do Something" onclick="btnSubmit_click" onclientclick="return confirm('Are you sure you want to do this?');"&gt;
&lt;/asp:button&gt;</pre>
Enjoy. <img width="0" height="0" src="http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=7de58f52-6ab2-4cb1-8824-1b66131ed060" /></body>
      <title>Confirmation Buttons in .NET</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/PermaLink,guid,7de58f52-6ab2-4cb1-8824-1b66131ed060.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/PermaLink,guid,7de58f52-6ab2-4cb1-8824-1b66131ed060.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 17:09:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>This is the simple way of doing "are you sure?" functionality in .NET:
&lt;pre name="dcode" class="html"&gt;&amp;lt;asp:button runat="server" id="btnSubmit" text="Do Something" onclick="btnSubmit_click" onclientclick="return confirm('Are you sure you want to do this?');"&amp;gt;
&amp;lt;/asp:button&amp;gt;&lt;/pre&gt;
Enjoy. &lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=7de58f52-6ab2-4cb1-8824-1b66131ed060" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/CommentView,guid,7de58f52-6ab2-4cb1-8824-1b66131ed060.aspx</comments>
      <category>Code</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=3934e922-785d-49a8-b4be-cb392ec3da32</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/PermaLink,guid,3934e922-785d-49a8-b4be-cb392ec3da32.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/CommentView,guid,3934e922-785d-49a8-b4be-cb392ec3da32.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=3934e922-785d-49a8-b4be-cb392ec3da32</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">I often use simple base classes for things
like address and name for more complex data structures, partly for readability and
partly for easy formatting overrides. So a User class might look something like: <pre name="dcode" class="html">	class Subscriber
	{
		Base.Name Name;
		Subscriber()
		{
			this.Name = new Name();
		}
	}
	</pre>
and the Name class would look as such: <pre name="dcode" class="html">	class Name
	{
		string First = "";
		string Last = "";
		override string ToString()
		{
			return this.First + " " + this.Last;
		}
	}
	</pre>
Why not null or string.empty for the Name defaults? Quite simply those values don't
play well in the UI and introducing them there seems to cause more code and potential
gotchas than it solves. In the UI, this class structure is as simple as I think it
can be made: <pre name="dcode" class="html">	User user = new User();
	something = user.Name.First;
	</pre>
Does the <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Demeter">Law of Demeter</a> apply
here? No - the Name object cannot be null and cannot return null parameter values
- those might be empty, but of course, we should probably checked if the User object
was actually loaded correctly to catch if the entire object is null. <pre name="dcode" class="html">	User user = new User();
	if(user.Load(SomeId))
	{
		something = user.Name.First;
		somethingelse = user.Name.ToString();
	}
	else
	{
		//handle when User is still null
	}
	</pre>
I'm always looking for readability and simplicity, I think this solves both well,
what do you think?<img width="0" height="0" src="http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=3934e922-785d-49a8-b4be-cb392ec3da32" /></body>
      <title>Nulls and UIs</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/PermaLink,guid,3934e922-785d-49a8-b4be-cb392ec3da32.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/PermaLink,guid,3934e922-785d-49a8-b4be-cb392ec3da32.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 16:33:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>I often use simple base classes for things like address and name for more complex
	data structures, partly for readability and partly for easy formatting overrides.
	So a User class might look something like:
	&lt;pre name="dcode" class="html"&gt;	class Subscriber
	{
		Base.Name Name;
		Subscriber()
		{
			this.Name = new Name();
		}
	}
	&lt;/pre&gt;
and the Name class would look as such: &lt;pre name="dcode" class="html"&gt;	class Name
	{
		string First = "";
		string Last = "";
		override string ToString()
		{
			return this.First + " " + this.Last;
		}
	}
	&lt;/pre&gt;
Why not null or string.empty for the Name defaults? Quite simply those values don't
play well in the UI and introducing them there seems to cause more code and potential
gotchas than it solves. In the UI, this class structure is as simple as I think it
can be made: &lt;pre name="dcode" class="html"&gt;	User user = new User();
	something = user.Name.First;
	&lt;/pre&gt;
Does the &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_Demeter"&gt;Law of Demeter&lt;/a&gt; apply
here? No - the Name object cannot be null and cannot return null parameter values
- those might be empty, but of course, we should probably checked if the User object
was actually loaded correctly to catch if the entire object is null. &lt;pre name="dcode" class="html"&gt;	User user = new User();
	if(user.Load(SomeId))
	{
		something = user.Name.First;
		somethingelse = user.Name.ToString();
	}
	else
	{
		//handle when User is still null
	}
	&lt;/pre&gt;
I'm always looking for readability and simplicity, I think this solves both well,
what do you think?&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=3934e922-785d-49a8-b4be-cb392ec3da32" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/CommentView,guid,3934e922-785d-49a8-b4be-cb392ec3da32.aspx</comments>
      <category>Code</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=ec6e8c8c-b76d-45de-91d9-66b948c55aa7</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/PermaLink,guid,ec6e8c8c-b76d-45de-91d9-66b948c55aa7.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/CommentView,guid,ec6e8c8c-b76d-45de-91d9-66b948c55aa7.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=ec6e8c8c-b76d-45de-91d9-66b948c55aa7</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">I've been trying to submit a very simple
Skype Extra for a client. For what is such a digitally based business, this submission
process is entirely analog and alltogether frustrating.<br /><br />
For the pages of developer documents that they have on their site, I found it overwhelming
and really wasn't sure where to start. After building a simple ClickOnce application
in C#, I later assumed that this type of application would not work as an extra. After
pairing down the application to simple HTML, I submitted, submitted and accidently
submitted again.<br /><br />
There are no contact email addresses that I could find anywhere on any of the corporate
Skype sites. After resorting to posting on their forums, I have come to find that
the extra will be manually reviewed, but that person is currently in Russia and will
not be able to review until they return.<br /><br />
With no clear submission policy, no contact email addresses, and no mechanism to understand
the status of your submission, I have to say I'm left entirely frustrated by this
process and can't really understand how in this day and age, they haven't automated
this process.<br /><br />
I understand the need to manually review extras, but if I were on the Skype staff,
I wouldn't want to be answering the same question over and over on the boards. I'd
put the ability to check the status in the hands of the submitter.<br /><p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=ec6e8c8c-b76d-45de-91d9-66b948c55aa7" /></body>
      <title>Skype Me On Your Tin Can</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/PermaLink,guid,ec6e8c8c-b76d-45de-91d9-66b948c55aa7.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/PermaLink,guid,ec6e8c8c-b76d-45de-91d9-66b948c55aa7.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:37:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>I've been trying to submit a very simple Skype Extra for a client. For what is such a digitally based business, this submission process is entirely analog and alltogether frustrating.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
For the pages of developer documents that they have on their site, I found it overwhelming
and really wasn't sure where to start. After building a simple ClickOnce application
in C#, I later assumed that this type of application would not work as an extra. After
pairing down the application to simple HTML, I submitted, submitted and accidently
submitted again.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
There are no contact email addresses that I could find anywhere on any of the corporate
Skype sites. After resorting to posting on their forums, I have come to find that
the extra will be manually reviewed, but that person is currently in Russia and will
not be able to review until they return.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
With no clear submission policy, no contact email addresses, and no mechanism to understand
the status of your submission, I have to say I'm left entirely frustrated by this
process and can't really understand how in this day and age, they haven't automated
this process.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I understand the need to manually review extras, but if I were on the Skype staff,
I wouldn't want to be answering the same question over and over on the boards. I'd
put the ability to check the status in the hands of the submitter.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=ec6e8c8c-b76d-45de-91d9-66b948c55aa7" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/CommentView,guid,ec6e8c8c-b76d-45de-91d9-66b948c55aa7.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=5b661a82-9b99-4e42-aa4f-42acbec52570</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/PermaLink,guid,5b661a82-9b99-4e42-aa4f-42acbec52570.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/CommentView,guid,5b661a82-9b99-4e42-aa4f-42acbec52570.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=5b661a82-9b99-4e42-aa4f-42acbec52570</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">Unfortunately, a very poor characteristic
that some developers and programmers have is a compulsion to shout from the mountaintops
their love of a platform, language or tool. Threads like <a href="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/001065.html">this</a> really
do nothing for anyone involved except flair tempers and expose childish name-calling
tendencies. I think Jeff is above all this and I'm a bit suprised he's jumped into
the fray. I do understand why he is upset, but <i>getting sucked in is where you ultimately
wind up in the same boat</i>.<br /><br />
You are obviously entirely too close to what you do if you're engaging in this type
of discussion. Users don't care what your application is written in. Business suits
could care less as well. Its all about making it work, and work well. If you actually
think one tool suits all, you have bigger issues to deal with at the moment.<br /><br />
Remaining indifferent can be the only correct answer. That's where I'm at right about
now.<br /><img width="0" height="0" src="http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=5b661a82-9b99-4e42-aa4f-42acbec52570" /></body>
      <title>On Indifference and shouting</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/PermaLink,guid,5b661a82-9b99-4e42-aa4f-42acbec52570.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/PermaLink,guid,5b661a82-9b99-4e42-aa4f-42acbec52570.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 17:03:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>Unfortunately, a very poor characteristic that some developers and programmers have is a compulsion to shout from the mountaintops their love of a platform, language or tool. Threads like &lt;a href="http://www.codinghorror.com/blog/archives/001065.html"&gt;this&lt;/a&gt; really
do nothing for anyone involved except flair tempers and expose childish name-calling
tendencies. I think Jeff is above all this and I'm a bit suprised he's jumped into
the fray. I do understand why he is upset, but &lt;i&gt;getting sucked in is where you ultimately
wind up in the same boat&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
You are obviously entirely too close to what you do if you're engaging in this type
of discussion. Users don't care what your application is written in. Business suits
could care less as well. Its all about making it work, and work well. If you actually
think one tool suits all, you have bigger issues to deal with at the moment.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Remaining indifferent can be the only correct answer. That's where I'm at right about
now.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=5b661a82-9b99-4e42-aa4f-42acbec52570" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/CommentView,guid,5b661a82-9b99-4e42-aa4f-42acbec52570.aspx</comments>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=144ecbf3-d6c2-43a0-864c-58f2c5e65240</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/PermaLink,guid,144ecbf3-d6c2-43a0-864c-58f2c5e65240.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/CommentView,guid,144ecbf3-d6c2-43a0-864c-58f2c5e65240.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=144ecbf3-d6c2-43a0-864c-58f2c5e65240</wfw:commentRss>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
        <p>
I found this little bit of code to help me keep track of moving from older classes
and methods to newer ones (in instances where I need to do so over time): 
</p>
        <pre name="dcode" class="html">		
[Obsolete("This class is being replaced with Program2.0")]
class Program
{
   [Obsolete("This method is being replaced with Process2.0")]		
   static void Process(string[] args)	
   {
   }
}
</pre>
        <img width="0" height="0" src="http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=144ecbf3-d6c2-43a0-864c-58f2c5e65240" />
      </body>
      <title>[Obsolete()]</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/PermaLink,guid,144ecbf3-d6c2-43a0-864c-58f2c5e65240.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/PermaLink,guid,144ecbf3-d6c2-43a0-864c-58f2c5e65240.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2008 02:02:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;
I found this little bit of code to help me keep track of moving from older classes
and methods to newer ones (in instances where I need to do so over time): 
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;pre name="dcode" class="html"&gt;		
[Obsolete("This class is being replaced with Program2.0")]
class Program
{
   [Obsolete("This method is being replaced with Process2.0")]		
   static void Process(string[] args)	
   {
   }
}
&lt;/pre&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=144ecbf3-d6c2-43a0-864c-58f2c5e65240" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/CommentView,guid,144ecbf3-d6c2-43a0-864c-58f2c5e65240.aspx</comments>
      <category>Code</category>
    </item>
    <item>
      <trackback:ping>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/Trackback.aspx?guid=576ffca7-35b6-45a3-83d4-b09ec395209f</trackback:ping>
      <pingback:server>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/pingback.aspx</pingback:server>
      <pingback:target>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/PermaLink,guid,576ffca7-35b6-45a3-83d4-b09ec395209f.aspx</pingback:target>
      <dc:creator>Dustin</dc:creator>
      <wfw:comment>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/CommentView,guid,576ffca7-35b6-45a3-83d4-b09ec395209f.aspx</wfw:comment>
      <wfw:commentRss>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/SyndicationService.asmx/GetEntryCommentsRss?guid=576ffca7-35b6-45a3-83d4-b09ec395209f</wfw:commentRss>
      <slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
      <body xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">If you had a 5 disc DVD changer and you
could only leave 5 movies in it, what 5 movies would you have or think about movies
that you watch over and over again and list the top 5. 
<br /><br />
Here are mine in no particular order.<br /><br />
1. Star Wars : The Empire Strikes Back<br />
2. The Godfather<br />
3. Pulp Fiction<br />
4. Airplane: The Movie<br />
5. National Lampoon's Vacation.<br /><br />
The last two were tough choices for me. I would not be afraid to call Anchorman or
The Naked Gun off the bench in tight game. The Godfather is one of my favorites, but
not an easy repetative view, so I would even go as far as subbing something in for
that.<br /><br />
Let's hear it!<br /><br />
Ron<br /><p></p><img width="0" height="0" src="http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=576ffca7-35b6-45a3-83d4-b09ec395209f" /></body>
      <title>5 Disc DVD Changer</title>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/PermaLink,guid,576ffca7-35b6-45a3-83d4-b09ec395209f.aspx</guid>
      <link>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/PermaLink,guid,576ffca7-35b6-45a3-83d4-b09ec395209f.aspx</link>
      <pubDate>Thu, 04 Oct 2007 17:25:24 GMT</pubDate>
      <description>If you had a 5 disc DVD changer and you could only leave 5 movies in it, what 5 movies would you have or think about movies that you watch over and over again and list the top 5. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Here are mine in no particular order.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
1. Star Wars : The Empire Strikes Back&lt;br&gt;
2. The Godfather&lt;br&gt;
3. Pulp Fiction&lt;br&gt;
4. Airplane: The Movie&lt;br&gt;
5. National Lampoon's Vacation.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The last two were tough choices for me. I would not be afraid to call Anchorman or
The Naked Gun off the bench in tight game. The Godfather is one of my favorites, but
not an easy repetative view, so I would even go as far as subbing something in for
that.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Let's hear it!&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Ron&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;img width="0" height="0" src="http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/aggbug.ashx?id=576ffca7-35b6-45a3-83d4-b09ec395209f" /&gt;</description>
      <comments>http://updyke.com/dustin/blog/CommentView,guid,576ffca7-35b6-45a3-83d4-b09ec395209f.aspx</comments>
      <category>Movies</category>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>